Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free:

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site:, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Google Analytics

Targeted advertising cookies


The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at or by post at:

24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu INRA Clermont Auvergne University


Joint Research Unit 1095 Genetics, Diversity and Ecophysiology of Cereals

Task 3 : Regulation

Principle : Immediate and massive neo-/sub-functionalization of duplicated genes.

To study the impact of ancient and recent genome duplications onto gene expression, we have performed transcriptomic analyses in rice and wheat respectively. The rice genome is a good model to study the effect of paleoduplications on gene expression and based on an oligoarray of ~61,000 genes, we were able to make an inventory of genes differentially expressed in the roots, leaves and grain tissues. These data enabled us to develop an expression map of the rice genome which did not indicate any co-regulation island, i.e. a region of the genome where the genes are preferentially expressed under the same condition or the same tissue. It appears that if we compare the current gene content of the paleoduplicated fragments, only 12.6% remain still duplicated today. This allowed us to conclude that, on a time scale of about 50 to 70 million years, 87.4% of paralogous genes have been lost through pseudogenisation mechanisms affecting one of the duplicates. By studying the expression profiles of 1440 paralogs that have been retained intact in their structure, we have shown that 88%, 89%, 96% of duplicated genes no longer have the same expression profiles in grains, leaves or roots, respectively, which is indicative of a neo- or sub-functionalisation phenomenon of the duplicates.

Bread wheat appears to be a very pertinent model to compare, at different evolutionary time scales, the impact of genome doubling on gene expression for both ancient events (50-70 million years for paleoduplications) or more recent events (2.5 million years for neoduplications linked to the hexaploid nature of bread wheat) of polyploidisation. The bread wheat genome appeared nearly complete diploidized over few million years of evolution. In the bread wheat genome, deriving from the hybridization of 3 (A, B and D) progenitors, we observed that among the 19149 (20% of 99386 annotated genes) genes conserved in triplets (i.e. 6383 triplets A-B-D), only 632 (10%) triplets show the same expression profile (during the grain development). After 2.5 million years of evolution, we detected only 20% of structural redundancy (retention of A-B-D triplets) for which only 10% show a perfect expressional redundancy (expression of A-B-D triplets).


Impact of polyploidization on gene expression (Throude et al. 2009) - The figure illustrates the duplicated genes in rice with the 12 chromosomes shown as circle and duplicated genes connected by lines in the center of the circle (left). Some expression patterns of duplicated genes during the grain development are shown in the same graph (y-axis for the level of expression and the x-axis for the grain development stages).